January 10, 2026
Image default
Technology

Apartment owners win privacy case over Tate Modern gallery

Dwell

Residents of a luxurious London block who’re making an attempt to cease guests on the neighboring Tate Fashionable artwork gallery peering into their glass-walled flats have received their privateness case at the UK’s Supreme Courtroom.

The homeowners of 4 flats within the close by Neo Bankside improvement took the Tate, considered one of Britain’s prime vacationer sights, to court docket after the gallery opened an extension in 2016 that includes a panoramic platform on its prime ground, which provides guests clear views of the within of some flats.

They utilized to London’s Excessive Courtroom for an injunction requiring the Tate to stop its guests viewing their flats from the viewing platform, however their case was dismissed in 2019 they usually misplaced an attraction the next yr.

However, on Wednesday, the Supreme Courtroom overturned these verdicts and allowed the flat homeowners’ attraction by a 3-2 majority.

Saying the court docket’s determination, Choose George Leggatt mentioned that the “visible intrusion” of individuals trying into the flats from the Tate’s viewing platform was “a transparent case of nuisance”.

He added: “The Tate is liable to the claimants below the regulation of nuisance. To determine on the suitable treatment, the case will likely be despatched again to the Excessive Courtroom.”

Within the court docket’s written ruling, Choose Leggatt mentioned the flats had been “below fixed statement” from the platform, which attracts a whole lot of 1000’s of tourists annually, a few of whom take images and publish them on social media.

“It isn’t tough to think about how oppressive residing in such circumstances would really feel for any unusual individual – very similar to being on show in a zoo,” the choose mentioned.

The flat homeowners’ lawyer, Natasha Rees, mentioned her purchasers had been happy and relieved, including they appeared ahead to working with the gallery to discover a sensible answer that protected all their pursuits.

The Tate didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

– Reuters



Source link

Related posts

Phoebe Litchfield, Meg Lanning fire Australia’s ODI win over Pakistan

Richard

Ex-minister misled public: Barilaro trade job report

Richard

Toyah Cordingley murder: Suspect extradited from India

Richard

Leave a Comment