January 11, 2026
Image default
Technology

Ex-Lebanon PM and prosecutor charged over Beirut port disaster

The decide probing the 2020 Beirut blast has charged Lebanon’s prime public prosecutor, the then-prime minister and different senior present and former officers over the devastating explosionjudicial sources stated and court docket summonses present.

Decide Tarek Bitar unexpectedly resumed an inquiry on Monday after it was paralyzed for greater than a yr by political resistance and authorized complaints filed by prime officers he was searching for to query.

The explosion on August 4, 2020 was attributable to a whole bunch of tons of ammonium nitrate saved on the port in poor situations because it was unloaded in 2013.

To this point, no senior official has been held to account.

Decide Bitar has charged former prime minister Hassan Diab and former ministers with murder with possible intent, in response to court docket summons seen by Reuters on Tuesday.

He additionally charged Prosecutor Normal Ghassan Oweidat, the top of Lebanon’s home intelligence company Main Normal Abbas Ibrahim, former military commander Jean Kahwaji and different present and former safety and judicial officers, court docket sources stated.

It was not instantly clear what that they had been charged with, however one judicial supply stated Decide Bitar had discovered Mr Oweidat had not acted responsibly with regard to the ammonium nitrate.

Reuters couldn’t instantly attain Mr Diab or Mr Oweidat for remark.

Normal Ibrahim declined to touch upon reviews he had been charged when contacted by Reuters on Monday.

Mr Kahwaji additionally declined to remark.

All these beforehand charged by Decide Bitar have denied wrongdoing.

Mr Oweidat on Tuesday despatched Decide Bitar an official letter saying the decide’s probe remained suspended and that no official determination had been taken on whether or not he may proceed investigating, in response to a duplicate of the correspondence seen by Reuters.

Decide Bitar’s earlier efforts to interrogate prime officers over the explosion that killed 220 people and shattered parts of Beirut have been hindered by factions together with the closely armed, Iran-backed Hezbollah.

The group has campaigned in opposition to Decide Bitar as he sought to query his allies and accused Washington of meddling within the probe.

Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah repeatedly known as for him to get replaced in 2021.

The investigation was paralyzed early final yr by the retirement of judges from a court docket that should rule on a number of such complaints in opposition to Decide Bitar earlier than he can proceed.

The court docket has been awaiting the appointment of latest judges to renew its work, a step authorities haven’t taken.

Decide Bitar met French judges visiting Beirut final week as a part of a French investigation into the explosion, whose victims included two French nationals.

He was unable to share paperwork with them on the time as a result of the investigation was frozen.

Decide Bitar resumed work on the idea of a authorized interpretation difficult the explanations for his suspension, the judicial sources stated.

Mr Diab, an educational, grew to become prime minister in January 2020 and resigned lower than per week after the blast.

Decide Bitar’s predecessor swiftly charged him and several other former officers with negligence over the chemical substances however that decide was eliminated in 2021 following political interference within the file.

Mr Diab stated in a press release in 2020 that he was assured his arms had been clear and that he had dealt transparently with the file of the Beirut port explosion.

Decide Bitar has scheduled questioning with 15 individuals all through the month of February, in response to judicial sources.

However authorized consultants and even family members of victims count on him to come across continued pushback.

Nizar Saghieh of watchdog NGO Authorized Agenda stated officers would possibly attempt to dispute the legitimacy of Decide Bitar’s resumption, whereas the judiciary or safety forces may refuse to hold out procedural steps for the fees to be served.



Source link

Related posts

AUKUS confidence remains despite Keating attack: Marles

Richard

How their document scandals differ

Richard

What Australian workers want has changed over 25 years

Richard

Leave a Comment